In the work a generative animation (created from an oil painting on plexiglass) plays on an iPad Air supported by an Amethyst Geode.
The focus of the research behind the work is the creative relationship between human and non-human intelligences, with the pivotal point of the argument being that technology sits in the camp of human intelligence. The triad that conceptually drives the theory and creates the works, is the intertwining between technology, man and nature. In essence the works are an illustration of an ongoing three-fold dialectical process - opposite forces come into conflict but instead of simply contradicting one another, they instead become synthesised into something more than the sum of their parts.
The objects come to together to create the final work - as in the vein of assemblage works. The technology is a part of the work - not as a method of display (as a canvas is for a painting for example) but as a integral part of the sculpture or installation. 
It has been said that scientific enquiries objectify Nature - what if then, rather than ​using technology​ as the instrument of our own supposed rise, we aimed to enhance our relatedness to nature ​via​ technology? If technology is not our opposite as such, but simply a mirror reflection, is it Nature then that can provide a true other, allowing for the movement towards a more evolved consciousness?​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
22 sec video, Amethyst Geode, iPad Air 1st gen 2016

Back to Top